A useful correction starts with one sentence
For an editorial correction, write to editors@advantagepeptides.com. Include the page address, the sentence in question and the paper or official source that supports the change. A direct link or a paper title helps us find the same material.
A short note explaining what's wrong and why is useful. Broken links and links to the wrong paper matter too.
Replies aren't guaranteed. This mailbox is for the words on these pages, and it isn't a place for urgent help. The site and the mailbox provide no medical advice.
What kind of detail changes the meaning?
A sentence can have the right number and still give the wrong impression. It might leave out that a result came from animals, call a safety observation a recovery benefit, or give a blend credit for one ingredient's finding. A few missing words can make a large difference.
For example, the BPC-157 tendon study used rats with cut Achilles tendons. That detail belongs beside its healing findings. It can't support a statement that a person's shoulder will recover faster.
If you spot a similar jump, point us to it. There's no need to settle the whole scientific question in your message. The reading list offers a starting point for checking the source behind a passage.
Keep care questions with the care provider
We can't assess symptoms, interpret personal test results, choose a medicine or give an injection plan. An editorial email can't replace a licensed clinician's assessment. Please leave private medical records and identifying health details out of a correction.
Questions about the prescription service mentioned on our home page belong with that service through its own published contact details. Its providers handle care requests and eligibility. This mailbox can't answer for them or arrange an appointment.
That includes questions about an existing treatment. The home-page mention isn't a route into care through this website.
New evidence can change the page too
A correction can be about a missing study as well as a misread one. If a new paper tests a blend in people, for example, tell us what it measured and which passage it affects. The connection between the paper and the claim is the helpful part.
For general reading questions, the questions page covers common sticking points. The comparison shows why a study of an ingredient and a study of a mixture answer different questions.